Legal Opinion

Zueger v. Carlson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1996No. Civ. 950205PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Lillian Zueger and LeRoy Kudrna appeal from a district court summary judgment dismissing their claims against Bentley, Inc., doing business as Boomers (“Boomers”). We reverse and remand for further proceedings, holding release of dram shop claims does not release all tort claims against a bar, and holding a bar owner has a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent and stop assaults on its patrons.

I

On October 29, 1993, Zueger and Kudrna were injured in a fight at Boomers, a bar in Mandan, North Dakota. According to the complaint, Mark Carlson, an off-duty bouncer at…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stevens v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Manuel v. WeitzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Vanderhoof v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. In Re Estate of ConleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lucas v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bies v. ObregonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API