Legal Opinion
Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1996No. 1995-0464PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 18.] KAY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. MARC GLASSMAN, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.,
1996-Ohio-430.] Civil procedure—Trial court abuses its discretion when overruling a motion for relief from judgment without first holding an evidentiary hearing. (No. 95-464—Submitted March 19, 1996—Decided July 3, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 16726. __________________ {¶ 1} On November 9, 1993, plaintiff-appellee Theodora Kay filed a complaint against defendant-appellant, Marc Glassman,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- McWilliams v. SchumacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gary R. Gorby & Assoc., L.L.C. v. McCartyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. KomorowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cleveland Municipal School Dist. v. Farson, 89525 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Benesch v. Action Software, Inc., 91708 (4-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.