Legal Opinion

Henry v. Himes

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 14, 2014No. Case No. 1:14-cv-129PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.

On December 23, 2013, this Court ruled in no uncertain terms that:

“Article 15, Section 11, of the Ohio Constitution, and Ohio Revised Code Section 3101.01(C) [Ohio’s “marriage recognition bans”], violate rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that same-sex couples married in jurisdictions where same-sex marriage is lawful, who seek to have their out-of-state marriage recognized and accepted as legal in Ohio, are denied their fundamental…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Kitchen v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Latta v. OtterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
  4. Whitewood v. WolfDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Baskin v. BoganDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API