Legal Opinion

Baskin v. Bogan

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 25, 2014No. Nos. 1:14-cv-00355-RLY-TAB, 1:14-cv-00404-RLY-TAB, 1:14-cv-00406-RLY-MJDPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge.

The court has before it three cases, Baskin v. Bogan, Fujii v. Pence, and Lee v. Pence. All three allege that Indiana Code Section 31-11-1-1 (“Section 31-11-1-1”), which defines marriage as between one man and one woman and voids marriages between same-sex persons, is facially unconstitutional. Plaintiffs in the Baskin and Fujii cases challenge the entirety of Section 31-11-1-1, while Plaintiffs in the Lee case challenge only Section 31 — 11—1— 1(b). Plaintiffs, in all three cases, allege that Section 31-11-1-1 violates…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Bostic v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Doe v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Love v. BeshearDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API