Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1989No. 87-2074PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

Appellant has raised twelve propositions of law. Each has been reviewed and for the reasons which follow we find them without merit and uphold the appellant’s convictions and death sentence.

I

Appellant asserts in his first proposition of law that he was denied his constitutional right to a fair capital trial due to the introduction of evidence of unadjudicated crimes from other jurisdictions.

During the trial the prosecution introduced evidence of approximately ten other criminal acts. The purpose of presenting this evidence was twofold. First, the state’s burden of proof on the first…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API