Legal Opinion

Kruckman v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an adverse judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury. Only one question is relied upon by . defendants upon this appeal. The action was against the defendants as joint tort-feasors.

It is the position of defendants that there was no evidence adduced of a concert of action, or conspiracy, on the part of defendants and, therefore, they cannot be held liable as joint tort-feasors. The question depends upon the testimony in the case.

The plaintiff contends that the testimony in the case is not properly before this court on account of a want of a bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henrichsen v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Thomsen v. GiebischOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re Frazier's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re Buell's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Luedinghaus Lumber Co. v. StapletonOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hall Et Ux. v. PettiboneOregon Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API