Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State of North Carolina

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1994No. 4:94-CV-107-BO2PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DENSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

This action is now before the court on the following motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment, and Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time. Because they are to some extent interrelated, they will be considered together.

I. Background,

This case was begun by the filing of a pro se complaint on August 3, 1994 seeking $2.5 Million in damages and prospective injunc-tive relief arising out of denial by a State court to the Plaintiff of visitation rights with his minor children. The underlying action was begun by this Plaintiff on January 30, 1989 in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. United States of America, on Behalf of and for the Use of Time Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. v. Gary L. Harre, Yancey Lamar AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Wickstrom v. EbertDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Carwile v. RayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. D'ONOFRIO v. Il MattinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Battle v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. McManus v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. Aguilar v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Alpha Pressure Pumping, LLC v. PooleDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API