Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Foote

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2009No. CV06050055; A133423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this case of first impression, petitioner appeals an order denying his petition for relief from the duty to report as a sex offender. The relevant statute requires the court to grant that relief if, among other things, a petitioner who was previously convicted of a single misdemeanor sex offense provides clear and convincing evidence that he has been rehabilitated and no longer constitutes a threat to public safety. Petitioner contends that he provided uncontroverted evidence that he has not reoffended in more than 10 years, that he successfully completed sex offender treatment, and that,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. StillmanOregon Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. A. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. KindredCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. A. R. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Ron Fortune v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API