Legal Opinion

State v. A. R. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 2021No. A172262PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

672 Argued and submitted January 19, affirmed September 22, 2021 In the Matter of A. R. H., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. R. H., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 17JU01020; A172262

499 P3d 851

Youth appeals an order requiring that he report as a sex offender pursuant to ORS 163A.025. Youth contends that the juvenile court erred when it determined that he had not met his burden under ORS 163A.030(7)(b) of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that he was rehabilitated and did not pose a safety threat to the public. Held: The juvenile court did not err. A reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. A. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Patterson v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. A. R. H.Oregon Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. C. S. S. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. D. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API