Legal Opinion

Marquette & Ontonagon Railroad v. Taft

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1873PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Houghton Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

One Charles Otto, a laborer for plaintiff in error, was accidentally struck, while in their service, by one of their cars, and seriously injured. The yard-master of the company, Mr. Theil, who had charge of the business and men in the yard where Otto was at work at the time, caused him to be immediately removed to his boarding-house, and also procured the defendant in error, who was a surgeon, to attend him. Doctor Taft thereupon rendered services for which he charged the company two hundred and twenty dollars. Payment of the bill was refused, and he sued the company and recovered, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. President of the Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. President of the Troy City BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Stephenson v. New York & Harlem RailroadThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API