Legal Opinion
Anthony Boring v. City of Dayton and Bill Sjolander
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided March 10, 2005No. 09-04-00168-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-04-168 CV
____________________
ANTHONY BORING, Appellant
V
THE CITY OF DAYTON AND BILL SJOLANDER, Appellees
On Appeal from the 75th District Court
Liberty County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CV 66,076-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Anthony Boring, filed suit against the City of Dayton and Bill Sjolander (1) alleging they conspired to build a high pressure water pipe and sewer line on Highway 146 with public funds to benefit CMC Rail Road Company, Inc., in violation of the Texas Constitution. Boring sought injunctive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.