Legal Opinion
Gaetzi v. Carling Brewing Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 25, 1962No. Civ. A. 21820PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCREE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former distributor of Carling beer and ale, commenced the present action on October 30, 1961, seeking damages for defendant’s wrongful termination of his Carling distributorship. Count 1 of the complaint asserts a treble damage claim under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. In Count 2, it is claimed that the termination is actionable on various common law grounds.
Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on Count 1, on the ground that the cause of action set forth therein is barred by the four-year statute of limitations…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.