Arnold v. Arnold

1. A husband is not relieved of liability to comply with an order for the payment of alimony merely because he has no property, and is not employed; but his ability to labor and his opportunity to find employment should also be considered.

2. That a man is mentally and physically disqualified for military service, and for this reason has been rejected by the military authorities, does not show conclusively that he is so incapacitated that he may not earn something for the support of his wife and infant child; and this is true although it may also appear that he is not able to work regularly or…