Boyett v. Boyett
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
“Where on application to be released from jail on a contempt charge the uncontradicted evidence shows the inability of applicant to comply with the order of court, it is an abuse of discretion to deny the prayers of the petition.” Poole v. Wright, 188 Ga. 255 (3) (3 S. E. 2d, 731). We think, on a test of whether or not the husband in the present case was in contempt of court, his ability to obey the order should be measured by the language of the above quotation, to wit, “inability of applicant to comply with the order of court;” and that his ability depends not alone upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poole v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Newsome v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Scruggs v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Huddleston v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Attaway v. AttawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Houtchens v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943