Legal Opinion

State v. Heithecker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1986No. C4-86-497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

FACTS

Appellant Erie Heithecker was convicted of careless driving under Minn.Stat. § 169.-13, subd. 2 (1984). His appeal is based on the admission at trial of certain allegedly prejudicial testimony and the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.

DECISION

Even though appellant’s statement of the case indicates that a full trial transcript is necessary on appeal and his brief repeatedly cites to a trial transcript, none was made available to the State or to this court. Even after the State’s counsel very properly drew this error to the attention of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godbout v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Godbout v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Setter v. MauritzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State of Minnesota v. Chad William MosherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API