Setter v. Mauritz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellants challenge the trial court’s interpretation and application of the jury’s answers to a special interrogatory verdict. Respondent claims appellants’ appeal is defective and should be dismissed.
Dismissed.
FACTS
At trial, liability having been stipulated to, the trial court submitted a special interrogatory verdict to the jury for a determination of appellants’ damages. The jury found as follows:(1) $2,358.28 — for medical expenses to date of trial(2) $3,150.00 — for loss of earnings to date of trial(3) $10,850.00 — for Angela M. Setter’s injuries(4)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marriage of Swartwoudt v. SwartwoudtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Dennis Frandsen & Co. v. County of KanabecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Swicker v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. Safety, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HeitheckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- McClellan v. KaragheusianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984