Legal Opinion

Setter v. Mauritz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1984No. C6-84-397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s interpretation and application of the jury’s answers to a special interrogatory verdict. Respondent claims appellants’ appeal is defective and should be dismissed.

Dismissed.

FACTS

At trial, liability having been stipulated to, the trial court submitted a special interrogatory verdict to the jury for a determination of appellants’ damages. The jury found as follows:(1) $2,358.28 — for medical expenses to date of trial(2) $3,150.00 — for loss of earnings to date of trial(3) $10,850.00 — for Angela M. Setter’s injuries(4)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Marriage of Swartwoudt v. SwartwoudtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Dennis Frandsen & Co. v. County of KanabecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Swicker v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Safety, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. HeitheckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. McClellan v. KaragheusianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API