Legal Opinion

LaFleur v. Odom

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1967No. File 10400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

Plaintiff, an attorney then of five years practice, sued for the reasonable value of services claimed to have been performed for defendant at her request investigating and securing evidence concerning an automobile accident. Defendant denied she employed plaintiff. The action was tried to the court and from a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals.

Under familiar principles our review of the evidence is in the light most favorable to the decision. Senechal v. Senechal, 79 S.D. 416, 112 N.W.2d 618. It appears defendant, while *54crossing a street in Rapid City, was struck by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Senechal v. SenechalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Matter of Estate of HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Brim v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. LaFleur v. OdomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API