LaFleur v. Odom
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
154 N.W.2d 212 (1967)
Robert LaFLEUR, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Laura ODOM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 10400.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
November 21, 1967.
Joseph M. Butler, Bangs, McCullen, Butler & Foye, Rapid City, for plaintiff and respondent.
Stephens, Riter, Mayer & Hofer, Pierre, for defendant and appellant.
BIEGELMEIER, Judge.
Plaintiff, an attorney then of five years practice, sued for the reasonable value of services claimed to have been performed for defendant at her request investigating and securing evidence concerning an automobile accident. Defendant denied she employed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Senechal v. SenechalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- LaFleur v. OdomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967