Legal Opinion

LaFleur v. Odom

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1967No. File 10400Published

1Opinion of the Court

154 N.W.2d 212 (1967)

Robert LaFLEUR, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Laura ODOM, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 10400.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

November 21, 1967.

Joseph M. Butler, Bangs, McCullen, Butler & Foye, Rapid City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Stephens, Riter, Mayer & Hofer, Pierre, for defendant and appellant.

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

Plaintiff, an attorney then of five years practice, sued for the reasonable value of services claimed to have been performed for defendant at her request investigating and securing evidence concerning an automobile accident. Defendant denied she employed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Senechal v. SenechalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. LaFleur v. OdomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API