Legal Opinion

Furbush v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1902No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by Louesa C. Furbush against the Maryland Casualty Company upon a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon an accident insurance policy upon the life of her husband, who was found dead in the highway.

The deceased was a lumberman, and on the day in question started to go from Nash to Washburn, a distance of a few miles. He was afterwards seen in Washburn between 9 and 10 o’clock the same day. A witness, one Lahey, one of three who found the body, started from Washburn to go to Nash. When they were about 3 or 4 miles from Washburn, Furbush passed them, driving alone in a sleigh. After walking 15 or 20 minutes more, the witness saw…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Insurance Co. v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hutchcraft's Ex'r v. Travelers' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  5. Robinson v. United States Mut. Acc. Ass'n of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Willard v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Auto Club Group Insurance v. MarzonieMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. Hooper v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API