Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Maddox
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The issue of fact tried by a jury in this case was whether insured committed suicide. He was killed by a pistol shot. No one saw the act. The proof tending to show suicide was entirely circumstantial. The court charged the jury that there was a presumption against suicide. It refused a special written charge to the effect that "such presumption is not evidence and cannot be treated as evidence by the jury in reaching a verdict." It is urged by appellant that this court give careful consideration to this question and follow in line with the weight of modern authority to the effect that the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WatfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.