Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 3, 1930No. 6 Div. 456PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue of fact tried by a jury in this case was whether insured committed suicide. He was killed by a pistol shot. No one saw the act. The proof tending to show suicide was entirely circumstantial. The court charged the jury that there was a presumption against suicide. It refused a special written charge to the effect that "such presumption is not evidence and cannot be treated as evidence by the jury in reaching a verdict." It is urged by appellant that this court give careful consideration to this question and follow in line with the weight of modern authority to the effect that the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WatfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API