Legal Opinion
See v. Baltic Estates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
*738A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744 [1995]; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129 [1985]). Whether a jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Costa v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Simon v. Nortrax N.E., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- O'Connell v. TusaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- O'Connell v. TusaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012