Legal Opinion

Bodisco v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1962No. S. F. No. 21009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner, Andrew Bodisco, seeks a review of the recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar that he be disbarred. Pour members of the board voted against the recommendation on the ground that the discipline was too severe.

Mr. and Mrs. Charles Martin employed petitioner in July 1958 to bring an action against Safeway Stores, Inc., for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Martin. In March 1958 petitioner orally negotiated a settlement agreement for $2,250 with Safeway’s attorney. Petitioner testified to the effect that before entering into the agreement he discussed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ambrose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API