Albert Einstein Medical Center v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
*102Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.
I must respectfully dissent. I would hold that the recent amendments to Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §152(2), as amended, by Public Law 93-360 (a) 8, U.S. Cong. & Admin. News 444 (1974), effectively preempted the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) to determine the appropriate collective bargaining unit of employees of non-profit hospitals such as Einstein Northern, and this Court lacks the power to review on substantive grounds that determination. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. Substation Operators & Maintenance Employees' CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Western Psychiatric Institute v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.