Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Railways Co. Substation Operators & Maintenance Employees' Case
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1947No. Appeals, 33 and 34PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
These appeals challenge the propriety of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board’s interpretation and application of Section 7 of the Act of 1937, P. L. 1168, as amended by the Act of 1945, P. L. 1379, 43 P.S. Section 211.7, and its jurisdiction to entertain a petition to determine the appropriate unit for the purpose of collective bargaining.
The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 95, a labor organization, on July 11, 1944, filed a petition with the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board asserting that a question concerning representation of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- McNish v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- General Building Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 542Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.