State v. Kinard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
Timothy Terreal Kinard appeals his conviction for assault and battery with intent to Mil (ABIK). Kinard alleges the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on the general intent required to convict for ABIK. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 13, 2000, Kinard and his brother, Reginald Davis, entered the home of seventy-six-year-old Hubert Bryan. Kinard claimed he and Davis entered the house through an unlocked door and found Bryan present at his home, but Bryan contended he discovered Davis in his home after he had unlocked the door and entered. Bryan suspected the men entered the home through…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. HawesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. ShandsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.