State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
**24Appellant Michael Juan Smith seeks reversal of his conviction for attempted murder. Appellant argues (1) he was entitled to a directed verdict because the State failed to prove he had the specific intent to kill the victim; (2) he was entitled to a mistrial based on improper statements made by the solicitor during her closing argument because the statements violated his due process right to a verdict based only on the evidence of his guilt; and (3) the circuit court erred by instructing the jurors they could infer malice based on the "felony murder rule" because the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GeterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. Robert X. GeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021