Legal Opinion
Nakash v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1987No. B027131PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Introduction
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Petition for writ of mandate. Petitioners (the Nakash brothers, Joe, Ralph and Avi) seek an order of this court directing respondent superior court to vacate its order of March 27, 1987, denying summary adjudication of specified issues in consolidated cases Nos. C 524347 and C 628588, and to enter instead an order granting such adjudication.
Division 3 of this court issued an alternative writ on May 12, 1987. On June 16, 1987, the California Supreme Court ordered that the matter be transferred to Division 1 of this court. The petition is opposed by real…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Avi Nakash, Joe Nakash, and Ralph Nakash v. Georges Marciano, Maurice Marciano, Armand Marciano, Paul MarcianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Single Chip Systems Corp. v. Intermec IP Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.