Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1983PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kupferman, J. P.

Plaintiffs, Morris and Ruth Goldstein, appeal from the denial by Special Term of their motion for partial summary judgment against defendant Consolidated Edison Co. (Con Ed). By that motion, plaintiffs sought an order precluding Con Ed from relitigating the issue of whether it was grossly negligent in failing to prevent the interruption of electrical service during the 1977 blackout, and setting the matter down for an inquest to assess plaintiffs’ damages. Special Term should have granted the motion to the extent *590of precluding Con Ed from again litigating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Food Pageant, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Ackerman v. Vertical Club Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Shaid v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Siegel v. Time Warner Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  5. Rubel v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API