Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Time Warner Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 27, 2007No. CV-04-8776-SGL(RZX), CV-04-8000-SGL (RZx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

LARSON, District Judge.

This case is the latest chapter in the continuing saga over who owns the copyright to “Superboy,” the youthful persona of the iconic comic book super hero “Superman,” spanning from the golden age of print media comics to the present-day revolution in digital media. Like the entire spectrum of graphics media technology, the law governing ownership rights to copyrights has changed dramatically, and it is precisely these changes in the law that bring this case to this Court.

Although the story of how Superman and later…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. HowellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  2. Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  3. Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Long v. CordainColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Marcus Gray v. Katy PerryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API