Legal Opinion

Lone Star Ford, Inc. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1994No. C14-93-00816-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment after a jury verdict awarding damages for conversion and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA). Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.-41-63 (Vernon 1987 & Supp.1994). Appel-lee, Howard R. Hill, Jr. (“Hill”) sued appellant, Lone Star Ford, Inc. (“Lone Star”), for damages after Lone Star sold him a used car it had already sold to someone else. We affirm as modified.

On appeal, Lone Star raises twelve points of error, most of which attack the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s findings.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mancorp, Inc. v. CULPEPPEERTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Howell Crude Oil Co. v. Donna Refinery Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. Schwartz v. Pinnacle Communications, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Robinson v. National Autotech, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Valley Nissan, Inc. v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Chavis v. Director, State Worker's Compensation Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API