Legal Opinion

Valley Nissan, Inc. v. Davila

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 4, 2003No. 13-00-153-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice VALDEZ.

Appellee, Jessica Davila (“Davila”), purchased a truck from appellant, Valley Nis san, Inc. (“Valley Nissan”), in reliance on a false statement by a salesman that she had been approved for financing. Davila subsequently sued Valley Nissan under various theories including violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”). See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.46 (Vernon 2002). A jury found in favor of Davila on all theories presented in the jury charge. The trial court entered judgment based on Davila’s election to recover…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. HonakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Matheus v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. Shale Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Plano Surgery Center v. New You Weight Management Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API