Arruda v. Director General of Railroads
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort. It is brought to recover damages for the instant death of the plaintiff’s intestate, which occurred in September, 1919, by reason of the collision of an automobile driven by him while a traveller on a public way, with a locomotive engine, at a crossing at grade with tracks of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad system during the period when it was under federal control pursuant to acts of Congress and a Proclamation of the President. 39 U. S. Sts. at Large, (c. 418) 619, 645. 40 U. S. Sts. at Large, (c. 25) 451. 40 U. S. Sts. at *257Large, 1733. 41 U. S. Sts.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Director General of Railroads v. KastenbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Root v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.