Legal Opinion
Browning v. Navarro
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1989No. Nos. 88-1761, 88-1894PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
Plenty of process has been provided to the parties in this dispute.1 It is fair to say that seldom have so many judgments decided so little. We must decide whether any process is still due. We conclude that the litigants have had their day in court and that it is time to end this dispute.
I. The Hatfields and the McCoys
The dispute began in 1979 when the Brownings sued Holloway in Texas state court.2 Holloway filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 on November 19, 1979 and removed the case to a federal bankruptcy court which remanded it back to state court. The bankruptcy…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. DaccachTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hinsley v. Boudloche (In Re Hinsley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- In the Matter of Pat S. Holloway, Debtor. Browning Interests v. Linda W. AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Weaver v. Texas Capital Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.