State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
We previously issued an opinion regarding the effect of police failure to comply with provisions of the privacy act when obtaining authorization to record conversations in a drug transaction.1 Our Supreme Court granted the State’s petition for review and remanded this case to us for reconsideration in light of the decision in State v. Jimenez.2 We have reconsidered our prior decision and now affirm the judgment and sentence in its entirety.
In our prior decision, we held that a request for agency authorization to record must include such information about the expected location of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007