Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

203 Or. 275 (1955)

279 P.2d 655

279 P.2d 886

BENNETT

v.

STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Submitted on motion for continuance January 18, 1955.

Argued January 19, 1955.

Denied January 26, 1955.

Affirmed February 9, 1955.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Ray H. Lafky, Assistant Attorney General, of Salem, for the motion.

Anderson, Franklin & Landye, of Portland, contra.

ON MOTION OF RESPONDENT FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING

MOTION DENIED.

LUSK, J.

1. The attorney general, appearing for the respondent, State Industrial Accident Commission, moved for a continuance of the oral…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. United Contracting Co. v. DubyOregon Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API