Legal Opinion
State v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1939No. 31,987PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 285 N.W. 903. Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of disorderly conduct under the provisions of a city ordinance of Minneapolis which provides that, "Any person or persons who shall make, aid, countenance or assist in making any * * * disturbance or improper diversion," shall, upon conviction be punished, etc. (Minneapolis Ordinances, 1872-1925, p. 760, § 2.)
Morris Dahl had been employed by J.D. McMillan for some 16 years. His duties consisted of driving his employer's car, helping with the maintenance of the lawn, doing vacuum cleaning in the house, washing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Barres v. Watterson Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Anderson v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- State v. ZankerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- City of Coos Bay v. Aerie No. 538 of Fraternal Order of EaglesOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- City of St. Paul v. AzzoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. KorichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Annenberg v. Southern California District Council of LaborersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.