Childs v. Lanterman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
Action to quiet title, and the defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The real question in issue between the parties is one of boundary, the appellants claiming that the land described in the complaint lies within the boundaries of the rancho La Canada, while the respondent contends that it does not. The evidence upon the point was conflicting, and this being so, we cannot, under the rule which is well settled in this court, disturb the finding of the trial court.
But it is urged by appellants that their motion for a new…
2Cited by3 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Childs v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915