Legal Opinion

United States v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 13, 2010No. 07 Civ.2083(WHP)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:

Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) brings this Title VII pat tern-or-practice action against the City of New York (the “City”) and the New York City Department of Transportation (the “DOT”). The Government alleges that the Defendants discriminate against women by hiring only men to work as City bridge painters. The evidence adduced at trial reveals a municipal division in America’s largest city that refuses to hire women, in spite of societal norms, sound business practice, and city, state, and federal law. The Supreme…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walsh v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bloomberg L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Barrett v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Florida Ex Rel. McCollum v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API