Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Gilbert

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1936No. S. F. 15613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a ranch in Alameda County, which for convenience has been described as upper parcel and lower parcel. In 1930 defendant Gilbert, a real estate broker, proposed to Charles J. Russell, the then owner, a deal whereby property in San Francisco owned by Harry Friend, together with $5,500, would be exchanged for the ranch. Gilbert at that time held an option to purchase the upper parcel for $5,000. He then approached plaintiff, Mrs. Fritz, and she agreed to finance the transaction, provided that Gilbert would assign to her his option, which he did. Accordingly…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Mulligan v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API