Legal Opinion
Mulligan v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1949No. Civ. 17139PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action for declaratory relief, plaintiffs appeal.
Facts: Plaintiffs alleged that they entered into a real estate option February 20, 1946, with Mary C. Durant, which read as follows:
“Real Estate Option. Los Angeles, California, February 20, 1946, Received of Ann Fleming and James II. Mulligan the sum of Five Hundred ($500.00) and no/100 Dollars as part payment for the following described Real Property [description].
11 The entire price to be paid for above described Real Property is Fifty-Thousand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Prey v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fritz v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Fitzgerald v. ProvinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Levelon Builders, Inc. v. LynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Harvey v. WhyteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.