Legal Opinion
Quaker Waxed Products Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 31, 1957No. 61309; protest 276885-K (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of this proceeding was classified by the collector of customs as “(Aluminum foil) as: — Foil under 0.006 inch thick: Aluminum, valued per pound — -Under 27% cents,” and duty was levied thereon at the rate of 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 382 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiff’s protest is in the following language:
August 15, 1955.
Collector of Customs
2nd & Chestnut Streets
Philadelphia 2, Pennsylvania
Dear Sir:
I wish to file protest to you against the liquidation of consumption entry #53 dated and filed July 2, 1954 and liquidated July 29,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- William J. McLean v. James L. MeekSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Palmer Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- E. Gross & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960