Legal Opinion

E. Gross & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1959No. 63098; protest 306918-K (Bridgeport)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Certain imported cotton cord tire fabric and cotton belting were classified as entered, respectively, within the provisions of paragraph 904(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for “Tire fabric or fabric for use in pneumatic tires, including cord fabric,” and of paragraph 913(a) of said act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, for “Belts and belting, for machinery: Wholly or in chief value of cotton * * Accordingly, duty was assessed upon said merchandise at the respective rates of 25 per centum ad valorem and 15 per centum ad…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Sterling International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. James Bute Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API