Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 26, 1960No. 63739; protest 279923-K (Ogdensburg)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation described on the invoice accompanying the entry as “Secondary Aluminum Foil” from Canada was classified by the collector of customs as aluminum foil less than six one-thousandths of 1 inch in thickness in paragraph 382(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 382(a)), or as modified by the Swiss Trade Agreement, 69 Treas. Dec. 74, T.D. 48093, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem or 11 cents per pound, respectively.

Various claims are made by plaintiff in its protest or by amendment thereto. The one primarily relied upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quaker Waxed Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API