Legal Opinion
United States v. Lopez-Medina
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 19, 2010No. 08-4055PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
Gerardo Lopez-Medina was convicted by a jury of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and sentenced to 235 months imprisonment. He contends: (1) his rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated by the admission of certain evidence, absent which there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the court erred in ruling he could not question a government witness about the nature of the witness’ recent conviction; and (3) the prosecution committed prosecutorial misconduct on multiple occasions. Finding only one harmless error, we…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. George Don GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. KamaheleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- United States v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BattlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.