Legal Opinion

United States v. Holmes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 2, 2010No. 09-2789PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Carlo Holmes 1 appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Count 1), and for possessing with intent to distribute in excess of five grams of crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count 2). Holmes raises a Confrontation Clause challenge to the admission of statements by a confidential informant through another witness, and he asserts that the Government’s evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt on both counts, entitling him to a judgment of acquittal. We affirm the drug conviction under…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Paris HollingshedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Jonathan WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  5. James Smith v. Brian CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API