United States v. Holmes
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Carlo Holmes 1 appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Count 1), and for possessing with intent to distribute in excess of five grams of crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count 2). Holmes raises a Confrontation Clause challenge to the admission of statements by a confidential informant through another witness, and he asserts that the Government’s evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt on both counts, entitling him to a judgment of acquittal. We affirm the drug conviction under…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Paris HollingshedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Jonathan WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- James Smith v. Brian CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.