Legal Opinion

United States v. Sean Lamont Cromer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2004No. 02-2394PublishedCited by 346 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARBLEY, District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant, Sean Lamont Cromer, appeals his conviction by a jury for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, Cromer asserts the following grounds for reversal: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the district court plainly erred by allowing a witness to testify about hearsay statements made by a confidential informant (“Cl”) indicating that Cromer was involved in drug activity; (3) the district court erred by not requiring the production of the Cl after admitting the hearsay statements made by the Cl; and (4)…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by346 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Langham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API