Legal Opinion
Honolulu Ltd. v. Cain
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 8, 1966No. [No. 245, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, J.,
delivered the majority opinion of the Court. Marbury, Horney and McWilliams, JJ., dissent. Dissenting opinion by Marbury, J., at page 600, infra.
On February 27, 1964, 66 year old Margaret Cain, one of the appellees and one of the plaintiffs below, was driven by her daughter-in-law Clara to the Hillendale Shopping Center in Baltimore County. The shopping center is owned by the defendant-appellant Honolulu Limited. The women arrived at Hillendale between 6:30 and 6:50 p.m. and shopped until 7:30 p.m. Returning to their automobile, the elderly Mrs. Cain slipped on a thin glaze of ice…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Lexington Market Authority v. ZappalaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Evans v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Schroyer v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Lloyd v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Keene v. Arlan's Department Store of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Tully v. DasherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.