Keene v. Arlan's Department Store of Baltimore, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtLiss, J.
“Plus ca change, plus la meme chose” 1 — the more things change, tne more they remain the same. We observe again here the proof of that aphorism in one of the latest of the many classic department store “fall down” cases which have found their way into the courts.
Dorothy Keene and her husband, Leonard, appellants, urge that Judge J. Harold Grady, sitting in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, erred when al the conclusion of the appellants’ case-in-chief he granted a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the appellee, Arlan’s Department Store of Baltimore, Inc. We agree with appellants…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Plitt v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Moulden v. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Curley v. General Valet Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Schear v. Motel Management Corp. of AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Rehn v. Westfield AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Maans v. Giant of Maryland, L.L.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Burkowske v. Church Hospital Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.