Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Harris

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 19, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-3103PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

This is an action under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits.

An administrative decision to deny benefits will be upheld on review if supported by “substantial evidence.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Dobrowolsky v. Califano, 606 F.2d 403, 406 (3d Cir. 1979). Substantial evidence has been defined as “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evi dence as a reasonable mind might accept as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Schonewolf v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Hartzell v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Brown v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API