Curtin v. Harris
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.
This is an action under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits.
An administrative decision to deny benefits will be upheld on review if supported by “substantial evidence.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Dobrowolsky v. Califano, 606 F.2d 403, 406 (3d Cir. 1979). Substantial evidence has been defined as “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evi dence as a reasonable mind might accept as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Schonewolf v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Hartzell v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Friedberg v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.