Legal Opinion
Hartzell v. Astrue
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 28, 2010No. Civil 09-4256 (NLH)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying the application of Plaintiff for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“Social Security benefits”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. The issue before the Court is whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in finding that Plaintiff was not entitled to retroactive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- BEATTY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BLACK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BLACK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BORCHERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- DANCE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.